Hi Lee,

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 11:18:04 +0100
Lee Jones [off-list ref] wrote:

The first part of this set extends the current PWM API to allow external
code to request a PWM Capture.  Subsequent patches then make use of the
new API by providing a userspace offering via /sysfs.  The final part of
the set supplies PWM Capture functionality into the already existing STi
PWM driver.

Is there a reason you decided to not put this driver in IIO? IMHO, it
would be more appropriate to make your PWM device an MFD that can either
bind to the PWM or the capture driver.
And BTW, IIO already has a sysfs interface (you may have to extend the
API to support your type of capture though).

Best Regards,

Boris

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com