Hi!
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:49:37AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
Hello Fabio,
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:54:19PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 06:16:50PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Steffen Trumtrar
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(rngc->clk);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ rngc->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (!rngc->irq) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "FSL RNGC couldn't get irq\n");
+ clk_disable_unprepare(rngc->clk);
+
+ return ret;
You are returning the wrong error code here:
Better do like this:
rngc->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
if (rngc->irq < 0) {
rngc->irq is unsigned, so this is never true.
quoted
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "FSL RNGC couldn't get irq\n");
clk_disable_unprepare(rngc->clk);
return rngc->irq;
}
So here comes my better approach:
As irq is only used inside probe it can be removed from struct mxc_rngc.
Good idea.
Actually it is currently used in the mxc_rngc_init function, but I think I can
just move the call there into the probe function and get rid of the irq in the
struct.
quoted
Or maybe like this:
ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "FSL RNGC couldn't get irq\n");
clk_disable_unprepare(rngc->clk);
return ret;
}
This looks better, yes. I will change that, of course.
Some people think platform_get_irq returning 0 should be handled as
error.
And who is right? drivers/of/unittest.c checks for irq < 0 for example.
Thanks,
Steffen
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |