On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 12:16:32AM +0530, Jayachandran C wrote:
quoted
From: Zi Shen Lim <redacted>
quoted
+ compatible = "brcm,vulcan-eval", "brcm,vulcan";
You use "brcm,vulcan" as the compatible string for both the platform and
the CPU nodes. You need different strings.
quoted
+
+ memory {
+ device_type = "memory";
+ reg = <0x00000000 0x80000000 0x0 0x80000000>, /* 2G @ 2G */
+ <0x00000008 0x80000000 0x0 0x80000000>; /* 2G @ 34G */
+ };
quoted
+/memreserve/ 0x80000000 0x00010000;
What is this for?
This seems to left over from the time we were using spin. Will take
it out. Thanks.
quoted
+
+/ {
+ model = "Broadcom Vulcan";
+ compatible = "brcm,vulcan";
As above, it doesn't make sense to have the same compatible string for
both the platform as a whole and the CPU.
Will fix this in v2.
quoted
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "brcm,vulcan", "arm,armv8";
+ reg = <0x0 0x0>;
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ };
Thanks for the review.
JC.