On Monday 15 February 2016 09:19 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:

On 02/14/2016 10:27 PM, Keerthy wrote:

quoted

On Saturday 13 February 2016 04:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:

quoted

* Nishanth Menon [off-list ref] [160212 14:32]:

quoted

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

* Nishanth Menon [off-list ref] [160209 14:17]:

quoted

On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:

quoted

The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
Correcting the thresholds for the same.

Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---

Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90

   arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
===================================================================

--- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts     2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
+++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts  2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530

Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?

we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.

Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
cycle?

personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
patch should probably be followed IMHO.

OK let's wait for that then.

OK. I will send a v2 with better documentation.

This data is in the AM572x datasheet:
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am5728.pdf

Table 5-3 in the current version contains the maximum junction
temperatures.

this indicates that there are "Commercial" and "extended" -> we may
need to introduce just 2 dtsis -> am57xx-commercial and
am57xx-extended and reuse those based on the part on the board. just a
suggestion..

Or use the minimum of the 2 to be on the safer side if we have to deal 
with one dtsi?

Regards,
Keerthy