[PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
From: Keerthy <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-15 04:29:30
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-omap, lkml
On Saturday 13 February 2016 04:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Nishanth Menon [off-list ref] [160212 14:32]:quoted
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
* Nishanth Menon [off-list ref] [160209 14:17]:quoted
On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:quoted
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:quoted
The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7. Correcting the thresholds for the same. Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> --- Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90 arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts ===================================================================--- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530 +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc cycle?personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic patch should probably be followed IMHO.OK let's wait for that then.
OK. I will send a v2 with better documentation.
Regards, Tony