On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Adds a function that sets the pointer to dev_pm_domain in struct device
and that warns if the device has already finished probing. The reason
why we want to enforce that is because in the general case that can
cause problems and also that we can simplify code quite a bit if we can
always assume that.

This patch also changes all current code that directly sets the
dev.pm_domain pointer.

quoted

--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c

quoted

@@ -875,13 +876,14 @@ static int acpi_lpss_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,

        switch (action) {
        case BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER:
-               pdev->dev.pm_domain = &acpi_lpss_pm_domain;
+               dev_pm_domain_set(&pdev->dev, &acpi_lpss_pm_domain);
                break;
        case BUS_NOTIFY_DRIVER_NOT_BOUND:
        case BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER:
                pdev->dev.pm_domain = NULL;

Missed?

quoted

                break;
        case BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE:
+               dev_pm_domain_set(&pdev->dev, &acpi_lpss_pm_domain);
                if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_LTR)
                        return sysfs_create_group(&pdev->dev.kobj,
                                                  &lpss_attr_group);

@@ -889,6 +891,7 @@ static int acpi_lpss_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
        case BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE:
                if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_LTR)
                        sysfs_remove_group(&pdev->dev.kobj, &lpss_attr_group);
+               dev_pm_domain_set(&pdev->dev, NULL);
                break;
        default:
                break;

This looks wrong. I didn't test yet, but I have concerns here. Why did
you add those calls?

Okay, for first glance it seems working on Intel Braswell. But can
yoyu point me out what was going on before this patch?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko