Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 5 authors, 2016-02-09

[PATCH v12 2/4] PM / Domains: add setter for dev.pm_domain

From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-29 16:35:53
Also in: dri-devel, linux-acpi, linux-omap, linux-pm, lkml

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Adds a function that sets the pointer to dev_pm_domain in struct device
and that warns if the device has already finished probing. The reason
why we want to enforce that is because in the general case that can
cause problems and also that we can simplify code quite a bit if we can
always assume that.

This patch also changes all current code that directly sets the
dev.pm_domain pointer.
quoted
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
quoted
@@ -875,13 +876,14 @@ static int acpi_lpss_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,

        switch (action) {
        case BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER:
-               pdev->dev.pm_domain = &acpi_lpss_pm_domain;
+               dev_pm_domain_set(&pdev->dev, &acpi_lpss_pm_domain);
                break;
        case BUS_NOTIFY_DRIVER_NOT_BOUND:
        case BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER:
                pdev->dev.pm_domain = NULL;
Missed?
quoted
                break;
        case BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE:
+               dev_pm_domain_set(&pdev->dev, &acpi_lpss_pm_domain);
                if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_LTR)
                        return sysfs_create_group(&pdev->dev.kobj,
                                                  &lpss_attr_group);
@@ -889,6 +891,7 @@ static int acpi_lpss_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
        case BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE:
                if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_LTR)
                        sysfs_remove_group(&pdev->dev.kobj, &lpss_attr_group);
+               dev_pm_domain_set(&pdev->dev, NULL);
                break;
        default:
                break;
This looks wrong. I didn't test yet, but I have concerns here. Why did
you add those calls?

Okay, for first glance it seems working on Intel Braswell.
One more test unveils this one

# modprobe -r sdhci-acpi
[ 1289.909441] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 1289.918205] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 4374 at
/home/andy/prj/linux-otc/drivers/base/power/common.c:150
dev_pm_domain_set+0x51/0x60()
[ 1289.934681] PM domains can only be changed for unbound devices
[ 1289.944843] Modules linked in: sdhci_acpi(-) sdhci mmc_core
led_class [last unloaded: dw_dmac_core]
[ 1289.958802] CPU: 1 PID: 4374 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 4.5.0-rc1+ #3
[ 1289.969736]  ffffffff81c38330 ffff88007bb53d18 ffffffff8133162f
ffff88007bb53d60
[ 1289.981844]  ffff88007bb53d50 ffffffff8105cd12 ffff88017a007410
0000000000000000
[ 1289.993996]  0000000000000001 0000000000000080 0000000000000000
ffff88007bb53db0
[ 1290.006123] Call Trace:
[ 1290.012600]  [<ffffffff8133162f>] dump_stack+0x44/0x55
[ 1290.022052]  [<ffffffff8105cd12>] warn_slowpath_common+0x82/0xc0
[ 1290.032462]  [<ffffffff8105cd9c>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50
[ 1290.042589]  [<ffffffff814867c1>] dev_pm_domain_set+0x51/0x60
[ 1290.052695]  [<ffffffff813a62a9>] acpi_dev_pm_detach+0x3f/0x84
[ 1290.062910]  [<ffffffff81486747>] dev_pm_domain_detach+0x27/0x30
[ 1290.073294]  [<ffffffff81480188>] platform_drv_remove+0x38/0x40
[ 1290.083585]  [<ffffffff8147da51>] __device_release_driver+0xa1/0x160
[ 1290.094335]  [<ffffffff8147e5a6>] driver_detach+0xa6/0xb0
[ 1290.104009]  [<ffffffff8147d435>] bus_remove_driver+0x55/0xd0
[ 1290.114053]  [<ffffffff8147eccc>] driver_unregister+0x2c/0x50
[ 1290.124076]  [<ffffffff81480232>] platform_driver_unregister+0x12/0x20
[ 1290.134957]  [<ffffffffa003681c>] sdhci_acpi_driver_exit+0x10/0x12
[sdhci_acpi]
[ 1290.146730]  [<ffffffff810ce0e9>] SyS_delete_module+0x199/0x240
[ 1290.156907]  [<ffffffff8100219b>] ? exit_to_usermode_loop+0x8b/0x90
[ 1290.167478]  [<ffffffff81002b83>] do_syscall_32_irqs_off+0x53/0xa0
[ 1290.177949]  [<ffffffff818b7f9a>] entry_INT80_compat+0x2a/0x40
[ 1290.187986] ---[ end trace a8351c0506ee239b ]---
[ 1290.213855] mmc0: card 0001 removed

Which function is guilty?
But can
yoyu point me out what was going on before this patch?
-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help