[PATCH V8 18/23] coresight: etm-perf: new PMU driver for ETM tracers
From: mathieu.poirier@linaro.org (Mathieu Poirier)
Date: 2016-01-27 18:33:56
Also in:
lkml
On 26 January 2016 at 08:27, Alexander Shishkin [off-list ref] wrote:
Mathieu Poirier [off-list ref] writes:quoted
+static int etm_event_init(struct perf_event *event) +{ + if (event->attr.type != etm_pmu.type) + return -ENOENT; + + if (event->cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) + return -EINVAL;perf_event_alloc() already does this. Except for this one doesn't cover the negative space.
Ack
[snip]quoted
+static void etm_free_aux(void *data) +{ + struct etm_event_data *event_data = data; + + pr_err("Queing work\n");Probably not pr_err().
That's an old debug message - I've removed it already.
quoted
+ schedule_work(&event_data->work); +}[snip]quoted
+static void etm_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags) +{ + int cpu = smp_processor_id(); + struct etm_event_data *event_data; + struct perf_output_handle *handle = this_cpu_ptr(&ctx_handle); + struct coresight_device *sink, *csdev = per_cpu(csdev_src, cpu); + + if (!csdev) + goto fail; + + /* + * Deal with the ring buffer API and get a handle on the + * session's information. + */ + event_data = perf_aux_output_begin(handle, event); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!event_data)) + goto fail;There really shouldn't be a warning here. I understand that the 'no buffer' case is taped over by the !csdev check above, but there are other ligitimate reasons for perf_aux_output_begin() to return NULL, like no-space-left.
That's too harsh yes.
quoted
+ + /* We need a sink, no need to continue without one */ + sink = coresight_get_sink(event_data->path[cpu]); + if (!sink || !sink_ops(sink)->set_buffer) + goto fail_end_stop;Is this possible after the coresight_build_path() things in setup_aux? Might be a better candidate for WARN_*ONCE().quoted
+ + /* Configure the sink */ + if (sink_ops(sink)->set_buffer(sink, handle, + event_data->snk_config)) + goto fail_end_stop; + + /* Nothing will happen without a path */ + if (coresight_enable_path(event_data->path[cpu], CS_MODE_PERF)) + goto fail_end_stop;I'd like to understand all the potential failures here, because it's really a good idea to keep those to a minimum for the sake of consistency. That is, if the user succeeded in creating an event, about the only good reason for the event not starting is a filled up buffer.
Enabling a path should fail when one or many components of that path are already enabled by an ongoing trace session. This situation is quite likely to happen since in a lot of design tracers share the link and sinks.
This is why it makes a lot of sense to keep all the coresight_build_path()/coresight_enable_path() to the .event_init() phase and let them fail early, if they should fail.
If we do enable enable paths in .event_init() we can't support multiple concurrent trace session (see explanation above). The ultimate design is to have a source directly connected to a sink but so far none of the coresight topologies I've seen have been wired like that.
Regards, -- Alex