On 26 January 2016 at 11:51, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [off-list ref] wrote:

Em Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:08:21AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier escreveu:

quoted

On 25 January 2016 at 14:29, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Em Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:12:42PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:

quoted

Em Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:46:22PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier escreveu:

quoted

On 14 January 2016 at 14:46, Mathieu Poirier [off-list ref] wrote:
I can't queue this patch for 4.6 without at least a reviewed by from you.

This one I remember, looks ugly, the name set_max_cpu_num() looks
strange, when that was restricted (static) to that cpumap.c file, it
wasn't a problem, exporting it for wider usage looks bad.

You've been waiting for this for quite a while, it seems, lemme stop
what I am doing to check this...

So, please check the patch below, what you need then is just to use
cpu__max_cpu().

I like your approach - thanks for the review.  I will spin V9 when I
have received Adrian's comments.

I'll take that as an Acked-by: and since this improves the current
situation by hiding needlessly exported global variables, I'll get it in
now, thanks.

I would have added this code in my patchset with the right authorship
- whatever works best for you.

Thanks,
Mathieu

- Arnaldo