[PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: act8945a: add regulator driver for ACT8945A

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

"Yang," == Yang, Wenyou [off-list ref] writes:

 >> Isn't the regulator part of the act8945a identical to act8865? Can't we just use the
 >> existing act8865-regulator.c driver? (E.G. support 8865 variant in the mfd driver,
 >> but only register the regulator sub device?)

 > Yes, the regulator part of the act8945a is identical to act8865.

 > But the act8865-regulator driver is a struct i2c_driver, and the mfd
 > sub-device driver is a platform_driver driver, it is not easy to use
 > it.

But the mfd driver could support the act8865 variant as well (by only
registering the regulator mfd cell).

-- 
Venlig hilsen,
Peter Korsgaard