[PATCH v1 3/3] ARM64 LPC: update binding doc
From: liviu.dudau@arm.com (liviu.dudau at arm.com)
Date: 2016-01-13 10:11:04
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
From: liviu.dudau@arm.com (liviu.dudau at arm.com)
Date: 2016-01-13 10:11:04
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:52:48PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 12 January 2016 15:13:35 liviu.dudau at arm.com wrote:quoted
quoted
int of_address_to_resource(struct device_node *dev, int index, struct resource *r) { ... /* flags can be get here, without ranges property reqired. * if the reg = <0x0 0xe4 4>, I can get flag of IORESOURCE_MEM, * if the reg = <0x1 0xe4 4>, I can get flag of IORESOURCE_IO,That is strange, the parent node has #address-cells = <2> so the first two numbers should be part of the address and not influence the flags. Can you add some debugging in of_get_address() and try to figure out what bus is used in *flags = bus->get_flags(prop) ?This is the standard ISA binding. The first cell is the address space (IO or MEM), the second cell is the address within that space. This is similar to how PCI works.
OK, but from DT point of view and given the parent's #address-cells = <2> and #size-cells = <1> should the reg not be something like reg = <0x1 0x0 0xe4 4> ? Best regards, Liviu
Arnd
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
?\_(?)_/?