[PATCH v5 05/11] spi: imx: Add support for loopback for ECSPI controllers
From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
Date: 2015-12-07 09:27:55
Also in:
linux-spi, lkml
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 05:57:03PM +0100, Anton Bondarenko wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Support for ECSPI loopback for IMX51, IMX53 and IMX6Q using TEST register. Signed-off-by: Mohsin Kazmi <redacted> Signed-off-by: Anton Bondarenko <redacted> --- drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c index 363276d..3525616 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c@@ -246,6 +246,9 @@ static bool spi_imx_can_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_device *spi, #define MX51_ECSPI_STAT 0x18 #define MX51_ECSPI_STAT_RR (1 << 3) +#define MX51_ECSPI_TEST 0x20 +#define MX51_ECSPI_LOOP BIT(31) + /* MX51 eCSPI */ static unsigned int mx51_ecspi_clkdiv(unsigned int fin, unsigned int fspi, unsigned int *fres)@@ -316,6 +319,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused mx51_ecspi_config(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx, u32 ctrl = MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_ENABLE, cfg = 0, dma = 0; u32 tx_wml_cfg, rx_wml_cfg, rxt_wml_cfg; u32 clk = config->speed_hz, delay; + u32 lpb = 0; /* * The hardware seems to have a race condition when changing modes. The@@ -356,6 +360,12 @@ static int __maybe_unused mx51_ecspi_config(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx, writel(ctrl, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CTRL); writel(cfg, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CONFIG); + if (config->mode & SPI_LOOP) + lpb |= MX51_ECSPI_LOOP; + + if ((readl(spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_TEST) & MX51_ECSPI_LOOP) != lpb) + writel(lpb, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_TEST); + /* * Wait until the changes in the configuration register CONFIGREG * propagate into the hardware. It takes exactly one tick of the@@ -1128,6 +1138,9 @@ static int spi_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) spi_imx = spi_master_get_devdata(master); spi_imx->bitbang.master = master; + spi_imx->devtype_data = of_id ? of_id->data : + (struct spi_imx_devtype_data *)pdev->id_entry->driver_data; + for (i = 0; i < master->num_chipselect; i++) { int cs_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "cs-gpios", i); if (!gpio_is_valid(cs_gpio) && mxc_platform_info)@@ -1154,10 +1167,10 @@ static int spi_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) spi_imx->bitbang.master->unprepare_message = spi_imx_unprepare_message; spi_imx->bitbang.master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH; - init_completion(&spi_imx->xfer_done); + if (is_imx51_ecspi(spi_imx)) + spi_imx->bitbang.master->mode_bits |= SPI_LOOP; - spi_imx->devtype_data = of_id ? of_id->data : - (struct spi_imx_devtype_data *) pdev->id_entry->driver_data; + init_completion(&spi_imx->xfer_done);
Some unrelated lines are moved in these two hunks. Is this necessary or just some leftover from development? Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |