Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 3 authors, 2015-11-25

[PATCH RESEND v2 3/4] ARM: BCM: Add SMP support for Broadcom NSP

From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli)
Date: 2015-11-10 02:29:53
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

2015-11-09 2:09 GMT-08:00 Linus Walleij [off-list ref]:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Kapil Hali [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Add SMP support for Broadcom's Northstar Plus SoC
cpu enable method. This changes also consolidates
iProc family's - BCM NSP and BCM Kona, platform
SMP handling in a common file.

Northstar Plus SoC is based on ARM Cortex-A9
revision r3p0 which requires configuration for ARM
Errata 764369 for SMP. This change adds the needed
configuration option.

Signed-off-by: Kapil Hali <redacted>
This version looks saner to me.
quoted
+static int nsp_write_lut(void)
+{
+       void __iomem *sku_rom_lut;
+       phys_addr_t secondary_startup_phy;
+
+       if (!secondary_boot) {
+               pr_warn("required secondary boot register not specified\n");
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
+       sku_rom_lut = ioremap_nocache((phys_addr_t)secondary_boot,
+                                               sizeof(secondary_boot));
Why is this address not just taken directly from the device tree?
It comes directly from DT, that's what bcm_smp_prepare_cpus() does
read from Device Tree.
If it is not in the device tree: why?

Also give it a sane name, bcm_sec_boot_address or so.
"secondary_boot" sounds like a function you call to boot
the second core.
Agree with that, there could be a better name which better reflects
this is a variable.
-- 
Florian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help