Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2015-10-19

[PATCH] pinctrl: mvebu: armada-38x: add suspend/resume support

From: Marcin Wojtas <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-19 10:10:05
Also in: linux-gpio, lkml

Hi Thomas,

Found it - I think there is an easy way to get rid of all global
variables in each pinctrl-<soc>. It's enough to:
- extend struct mvebu_pinctrl with generic pointer
- pass SoC specific structure to mvebu_pinctrl_probe via dev->driver_data
- in mvebu_pinconf_group_set/get pass an additional argument to
mpp_set/get: struct mvebu_pinctrl *pctl.
- update mpp_set/get callbacks in each driver accordingly
This way in SoC-specific pinctrl driver we determine what data we want
to use and how. I can prepare a patchset with all described changes.
I'm looking forward to your feedback.

Best regards,
Marcin

2015-10-19 11:25 GMT+02:00 Marcin Wojtas [off-list ref]:
Thomas,

2015-10-19 9:23 GMT+02:00 Thomas Petazzoni
[off-list ref]:
quoted
Hello,

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:04:49 +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
quoted
quoted
I don't like this. The mvebu_pinctrl_soc_info structure is meant to be
a read-only structure that only describes static information giving
SoC-specific details for pin-muxing. The idea is that in the event
where you had multiple pinctrl in the same system, you would still have
only one instance of mvebu_pinctrl_soc_info.
Ok, understood. What with current static globals, like mpp_base? This
is a problem when we consider hypothetical multi-pintrl system...
The current driver is indeed not designed for multiple instances of the
same pinctrl controller. But that's exactly what Russell is asking for.
In each mvebu pinctl there are <soc>_mpp_ctrl_get/set force usage of
global mpp_base. In order not to use it this way the functions have to
be redesigned. IMO having an acces to pdev would be sufficient (please
see my proposal below), but yet I don't have a clear idea, how to do
it,
quoted
quoted
In genereal, I think storing additional global data is not
starightforward, as dev->platform_data and dev->driver_data are
currently occupied by mvebu_pinctrl and mvebu_pinctrl_soc_info. I
propose the following:


1. Create a new structure:
struct mvebu_pinctrl_pm_info {
This definitely shouldn't be called "pm_info", because 'base' is not PM
related. It should be mvebu_pinctrl_state or something like that.
quoted
    void __iomem *base;
    static u32 *mpp_saved_regs;
    int nregs;
}

2. Add new field to struct mvebu_pinctrl:
struct mvebu_pinctrl_pm_info *pm_info;
Does not work because "mvebu_pinctrl_pm_info" cannot be a generic
structure, it has to be a per-SoC driver structure, since the set of
registers to save for PM reasons is different from one SoC to the
other. Also, some SoC have only one "base" pointer, some others (like
Dove) have multiple.

So it should be the other way around: the SoC-specific driver create a
structure, and this structure points back to the mvebu_pinctrl
structure.
How about a following compromise:
Instead of forcing pm_info, we can add a generic pointer to struct
mvebu_pinctrl, e.g. void *priv; and enable passing it in a way I
proposed before.

This way each SoC-specific driver can attach whatever is needed for
its operation. For example in A38X/AXP it would be *base,
*mpp_saved_regs and nregs gathered in one structure, but it wouldn't
force anything specific for other machines. As a result in A38X/AXP in
suspend/resume routines, there would be no globals in use at all.

Best regards,
Marcin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help