[PATCH] pinctrl: mvebu: armada-38x: add suspend/resume support
From: Marcin Wojtas <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-19 10:10:05
Also in:
linux-gpio, lkml
Hi Thomas, Found it - I think there is an easy way to get rid of all global variables in each pinctrl-<soc>. It's enough to: - extend struct mvebu_pinctrl with generic pointer - pass SoC specific structure to mvebu_pinctrl_probe via dev->driver_data - in mvebu_pinconf_group_set/get pass an additional argument to mpp_set/get: struct mvebu_pinctrl *pctl. - update mpp_set/get callbacks in each driver accordingly This way in SoC-specific pinctrl driver we determine what data we want to use and how. I can prepare a patchset with all described changes. I'm looking forward to your feedback. Best regards, Marcin 2015-10-19 11:25 GMT+02:00 Marcin Wojtas [off-list ref]:
Thomas, 2015-10-19 9:23 GMT+02:00 Thomas Petazzoni [off-list ref]:quoted
Hello, On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:04:49 +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:quoted
quoted
I don't like this. The mvebu_pinctrl_soc_info structure is meant to be a read-only structure that only describes static information giving SoC-specific details for pin-muxing. The idea is that in the event where you had multiple pinctrl in the same system, you would still have only one instance of mvebu_pinctrl_soc_info.Ok, understood. What with current static globals, like mpp_base? This is a problem when we consider hypothetical multi-pintrl system...The current driver is indeed not designed for multiple instances of the same pinctrl controller. But that's exactly what Russell is asking for.In each mvebu pinctl there are <soc>_mpp_ctrl_get/set force usage of global mpp_base. In order not to use it this way the functions have to be redesigned. IMO having an acces to pdev would be sufficient (please see my proposal below), but yet I don't have a clear idea, how to do it,quoted
quoted
In genereal, I think storing additional global data is not starightforward, as dev->platform_data and dev->driver_data are currently occupied by mvebu_pinctrl and mvebu_pinctrl_soc_info. I propose the following: 1. Create a new structure: struct mvebu_pinctrl_pm_info {This definitely shouldn't be called "pm_info", because 'base' is not PM related. It should be mvebu_pinctrl_state or something like that.quoted
void __iomem *base; static u32 *mpp_saved_regs; int nregs; } 2. Add new field to struct mvebu_pinctrl: struct mvebu_pinctrl_pm_info *pm_info;Does not work because "mvebu_pinctrl_pm_info" cannot be a generic structure, it has to be a per-SoC driver structure, since the set of registers to save for PM reasons is different from one SoC to the other. Also, some SoC have only one "base" pointer, some others (like Dove) have multiple. So it should be the other way around: the SoC-specific driver create a structure, and this structure points back to the mvebu_pinctrl structure.How about a following compromise: Instead of forcing pm_info, we can add a generic pointer to struct mvebu_pinctrl, e.g. void *priv; and enable passing it in a way I proposed before. This way each SoC-specific driver can attach whatever is needed for its operation. For example in A38X/AXP it would be *base, *mpp_saved_regs and nregs gathered in one structure, but it wouldn't force anything specific for other machines. As a result in A38X/AXP in suspend/resume routines, there would be no globals in use at all. Best regards, Marcin