[PATCH] pinctrl: mvebu: armada-38x: add suspend/resume support
From: Marcin Wojtas <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-19 06:04:52
Also in:
linux-gpio, lkml
Hi Thomas, 2015-10-18 16:01 GMT+02:00 Thomas Petazzoni [off-list ref]:
Hello Marcin, On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 10:43:42 +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:quoted
Thanks for pointing this. I based on pinctrl-armada-xp.c (it needs a fix then, too) and it worked. I must have missed, because I got proper registers' number and values in suspend/resume routines. As pinctrl-armada-xp.c needs also a small fix and in order not to duplicate code, how about a following solution: - *mpp_saved_regs and *mpp_base become members of struct mvebu_pinctrl_soc_infoI don't like this. The mvebu_pinctrl_soc_info structure is meant to be a read-only structure that only describes static information giving SoC-specific details for pin-muxing. The idea is that in the event where you had multiple pinctrl in the same system, you would still have only one instance of mvebu_pinctrl_soc_info.
Ok, understood. What with current static globals, like mpp_base? This is a problem when we consider hypothetical multi-pintrl system...
So, I'd prefer if mpp_saved_regs and mpp_base became members of a new structure, that gets allocated at ->probe() time, on a per-instance basis.quoted
- common mvebu_pinctrl_suspend/resume functions in pinctrl-mvebu.c (now there will be two users AXP and A38X)Not sure how to handle that if the per-instance structure is defined on a per-SoC basis, but I'm interested in seeing proposals.
In genereal, I think storing additional global data is not
starightforward, as dev->platform_data and dev->driver_data are
currently occupied by mvebu_pinctrl and mvebu_pinctrl_soc_info. I
propose the following:
1. Create a new structure:
struct mvebu_pinctrl_pm_info {
void __iomem *base;
static u32 *mpp_saved_regs;
int nregs;
}
2. Add new field to struct mvebu_pinctrl:
struct mvebu_pinctrl_pm_info *pm_info;
3. In armada_38x/xp_pinctrl_probe we do the allocations and pass
struct pm_info using dev->driver data (later in mvebu_pinctrl_probe it
will be replaced by struct mvebu_pinctrl):
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pm_info);
return mvebu_pinctrl_probe(pdev);
4. In mvebu_pinctrl_probe:
struct mvebu_pinctrl_pm_info *pm_info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
(...)
if (pm_info)
pctl->pm_info = pm_info;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctl);
5. Now, we can simply use all stored data in common
mvebu_pinctrl_suspend/resume.
I hope the above is clear. I'm looking forward to your opinion.
Beste regards,
Marcin