Hi Lee,

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Lee Jones wrote:

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Peter Griffin wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Peter Griffin wrote:

quoted

These nodes are required to get the fdma driver working
on STiH407 based silicon.

Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
index 838b812..da07474b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi

@@ -565,5 +565,56 @@
 						  <&phy_port2 PHY_TYPE_USB3>;
 			};
 		};
+
+		fdma0: fdma0-audio at 8e20000 {

I'm not familiar with the FDMA driver, so can't comment knowledgeably,
but the <dev> part of <dev>@<base_address> should only describe the
type of hardware.  I believe in this case it should just be
dma at 08e20000.  Also notice the leading zero in the address, which I
believe mitigates possible confusion.  Then you be more specific with
the label, so something like 'fdma-audio' seems appropriate here.

Ok, can change to that format in v3.

quoted

quoted

+			compatible = "st,stih407-fdma-mpe31";
+			reg = <0x8e20000 0x20000>;

I personally find padding up to 32bits helpful in the addresses.

None of the stih407-family nodes I can see have this padding, including
the ones merged by you.

Nither of these two facts mean it's correct.

I thought it was a 'personal' thing. If it is mandated by the spec, then that
is different.

I'm happy to write a patch to correct them all.

Are you sure your actually correcting anything? Where does it say you
should have a leading zero?

Bear in mind that this isn't a hard and fast rule.  Both work and are
legal.  I just think the padding is more consistent.

Surely adding a patch with how the nodes are currently formatted, is more consistent
than adding a patch with padding?

regards,

Peter.