Thread (40 messages) 40 messages, 6 authors, 2015-08-10

[PATCH 3/9] gpio: Allow hogged gpios to be requested

From: Markus Pargmann <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-29 06:52:06
Also in: linux-gpio

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:17:53AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:01:42PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:
quoted
Hi Uwe,

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:27:02PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
quoted
Hello,

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:32:44AM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:
quoted
It can be useful to claim hogged gpios later, for example from
userspace. This allows to set defaults for GPIOs using the hogging
mechanism and override the setup later from userspace or a kernel driver.

This patch adds a check for hogged gpios to allow requesting them. If
the gpio is not hogged but marked as requested, it still fails with
-EBUSY.

Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <redacted>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index bf4bd1d120c3..9f402b159cbe 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -798,7 +798,8 @@ static int __gpiod_request(struct gpio_desc *desc, const char *label)
 	 * before IRQs are enabled, for non-sleeping (SOC) GPIOs.
 	 */
 
-	if (test_and_set_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags) == 0) {
+	if (test_and_set_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags) == 0 ||
+	    test_and_clear_bit(FLAG_IS_HOGGED, &desc->flags) == 1) {
 		desc_set_label(desc, label ? : "?");
 		status = 0;
I don't like this patch. IMHO hogging is a "use" of a GPIO that should
prevent it being requested.
I disagree with you here. The original patch stated in its description
that it was designed to initialize GPIOs. In my understanding this does
not necessarily mean that a hogged GPIO has to be blocked forever.
IIRC, this use case was discussed but was rejected by Linus when hogs
were added:

	https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACRpkdZcNcPBYQM438CZJx1gYst9BFBSTj-3Qv2aPGF9pdWa5g at mail.gmail.com
I see. Yes I really would like to have this 'initial settings' feature.
Any suggestions for a better way?

Best regards,

Markus
Linus?

Johan
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150729/9f394a80/attachment.sig>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help