Hi Daniel,

On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 19:32 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:

quoted

@@ -88,6 +88,13 @@
                #clock-cells = <0>;
        };

+       cpum_ck: dummy_clk {

I'm not a big fan of this "dummy_clk".
The 'name' part of the devicetree node is supposed to be generic.
So, perhaps just oscillator at 2, and move it down below clk32k: oscillator at 1.
Otherwise:

cpum_ck is a test clock which only available in IC test. It's empty on
MT8173 evaluation or production boards. Should we name this kind of
empty clock as an oscillator? Or is there a better name for it?


Best regards,

James