Hi Dmitry,

On 07/20/2015 11:54 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:09:30PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:

quoted

* Vignesh R [off-list ref] [150719 21:53]:

quoted

@@ -445,6 +443,8 @@ static struct pixcir_ts_platform_data *pixcir_parse_dt(struct device *dev)
 	dev_dbg(dev, "%s: x %d, y %d, gpio %d\n", __func__,
 		pdata->x_max + 1, pdata->y_max + 1, pdata->gpio_attb);
 
+	pdata->wakeirq = of_irq_get_byname(dev->of_node, "wakeupirq");
+
 	return pdata;

What about handling -EPROVE_DEFER here? At least pinctrl-single can be
be a loadable module for the dedicated wakeirqs.

Right. I think we should only allow -ENODATA to continue and return
error in all other cases.

-EINVAL will be returned if "interrupt-names" is not specified. I will
make execption for -ENODATA & -EINVAL, and return error in all other cases?

Also, I think "irq" suffix on name is redundant.

Ok, will drop "irq" suffix:

+		interrupt-names = "tsc", "wakeup";

Thanks.

-- 
Regards
Vignesh