On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:09:30PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Vignesh R [off-list ref] [150719 21:53]:
quoted
@@ -445,6 +443,8 @@ static struct pixcir_ts_platform_data *pixcir_parse_dt(struct device *dev)
dev_dbg(dev, "%s: x %d, y %d, gpio %d\n", __func__,
pdata->x_max + 1, pdata->y_max + 1, pdata->gpio_attb);
+ pdata->wakeirq = of_irq_get_byname(dev->of_node, "wakeupirq");
+
return pdata;
What about handling -EPROVE_DEFER here? At least pinctrl-single can be
be a loadable module for the dedicated wakeirqs.
Right. I think we should only allow -ENODATA to continue and return
error in all other cases.
Also, I think "irq" suffix on name is redundant.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry