[PATCH 1/7] pinctrl: UniPhier: add UniPhier pinctrl core support
From: Masahiro Yamada <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-09 05:32:27
Also in:
linux-gpio, lkml
From: Masahiro Yamada <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-09 05:32:27
Also in:
linux-gpio, lkml
Hi Paul, 2015-07-09 5:39 GMT+09:00 Paul Bolle [off-list ref]:
Hi Masahiro, On wo, 2015-07-08 at 14:01 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:quoted
Actually, most of pinctrl drivers are boolean, but most of them conventionally have MODULE_AUTHOR, THIS_MODULE, etc. I do not think it looks so weird. Thought?It's a rather common pattern, but I think it's an anti-pattern nevertheless. See the discussion that Shobhit Kumar, Paul Gortmaker, and I had starting in https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/20/63 . Please let me know if you're unconvinced by the arguments brought forward by both Pauls in that discussion.
After I read your references and thought a bit more, I am now considering to change the bool into tristate. Pinctrl drivers usually contain quite big pin tables, so it sounds somewhat reasonable to make it loadable, given that minimal pin-settings could be done in the boot-loader. Actually, some of pinctrl drivers in the mainline are already tristate. I will send v2 later with some other fixes I have noticed. Is this OK with you? -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada