Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 4 authors, 2015-07-28

[PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: mvebu: Warn about the wake-up sources not taken into account in suspend

From: Gregory CLEMENT <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-03 09:55:39
Also in: linux-pm, lkml

Thanks,

Gregory
On 01/07/2015 18:04, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Hello,

On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 19:19:00 +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
quoted
On the Armada 370/XP/38x/39x SoCs when the suspend to ram feature is
supported, the SoC is shutdown and will be waken up by an external
waken -> woken
OK
quoted
micro-controller, so there is no possibility to setup wake-up source
source -> sources
OK
quoted
from Linux. However, in standby mode, the SoCs stay powered and it is
stay powered -> stays powered on
SoCs are plural (but maybe there is a special rule for acronym). However
to be more coherent I will also make the previous SoC plural too.

quoted
possible to wake-up from any interrupt sources. As, when user decide to
setup a wake-up source, there is no way to know if they will be
wake-up source from suspend or from standby, then we chose allowing to
setup all the interrupt as wake-up sources.
Hum. "Since when the users configures the enabled wake-up sources there
is no way to know if the user will be doing suspend to RAM or standby,
we just allow all wake-up sources to be enabled, and only warn when
entering suspend to RAM".
OK
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm.c
index 264073a777d8..4402dcfa7c56 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm.c
@@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ static int mvebu_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
 		cpu_do_idle();
 		break;
 	case PM_SUSPEND_MEM:
+		pr_warn("None of the wakeup sources will be taken into account in suspend to ram\n");
We already had some discussion about this, and I believe this continue
to be confusing: there are some wake-up sources taken into account when
in suspend to RAM: the special button used by the micro-controller. It
is indeed not a wake-up source in the Linux sense, but it is still a
wake-up source. With such a message, the user may believe that there is
simply no way of resuming the platform.
Yes you're right, I was speak about the linux wakeup source, but it is
confusing for a "standard" user.
Maybe just:

	pr_warn("Entering suspend to RAM. Only special wake-up sources will resume the system\n");
I will take this.

Thanks,

Gregory

-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help