[PATCH 7/7] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Confine legacy function GPIOs to SH
From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart)
Date: 2015-06-30 09:38:12
Also in:
linux-gpio, linux-sh
Hi Geert, Thank you for the patch. On Tuesday 30 June 2015 09:45:27 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Legacy function GPIOs are no longer used on ARM since commit a27c5cd1a08cc95c ("sh-pfc: sh73a0: Remove function GPIOs"). Extract its setup code into a separate function, and make all function GPIO related code and data depend on CONFIG_SUPERH. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> --- Compile-tested on sh using se7724_defconfig. --- drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.h | 2 ++ drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.h b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.h index 4c3c37bf7161804d..c38ace46d7111b0d 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.h +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.h@@ -46,7 +46,9 @@ struct sh_pfc { unsigned int nr_gpio_pins; struct sh_pfc_chip *gpio; +#ifdef CONFIG_SUPERH struct sh_pfc_chip *func; +#endif struct sh_pfc_pinctrl *pinctrl; };diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c index 30654e800580524d..15f4eea186e2ba56 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c@@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ static int gpio_pin_setup(struct sh_pfc_chip *chip) * Function GPIOs */ +#ifdef CONFIG_SUPERH static int gpio_function_request(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset) { static bool __print_once;@@ -330,6 +331,31 @@ static int gpio_function_setup(struct sh_pfc_chip*chip) return 0; } +static int sh_pfc_add_function_gpios(struct sh_pfc *pfc) +{ + struct sh_pfc_chip *chip; + + if (!pfc->info->nr_func_gpios) + return 0; + + chip = sh_pfc_add_gpiochip(pfc, gpio_function_setup, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(chip)) + return PTR_ERR(chip); + + pfc->func = chip; + + return 0; +} + +static void sh_pfc_remove_function_gpios(struct sh_pfc *pfc) +{ + gpiochip_remove(&pfc->func->gpio_chip); +} +#else +static inline int sh_pfc_add_function_gpios(struct sh_pfc *pfc) { return 0; } +static inline int sh_pfc_remove_function_gpios(struct sh_pfc *pfc) { return 0; }
Given that those functions are only called from a single location, would it make sense to just compile the calls conditionally instead ? I would find that slightly more readable as it would be more explicit.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+#endif + /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Register/unregister */@@ -397,22 +423,13 @@ int sh_pfc_register_gpiochip(struct sh_pfc *pfc) } /* Register the function GPIOs chip. */ - if (pfc->info->nr_func_gpios == 0) - return 0; - - chip = sh_pfc_add_gpiochip(pfc, gpio_function_setup, NULL); - if (IS_ERR(chip)) - return PTR_ERR(chip); - - pfc->func = chip; - - return 0; + return sh_pfc_add_function_gpios(pfc); } int sh_pfc_unregister_gpiochip(struct sh_pfc *pfc) { gpiochip_remove(&pfc->gpio->gpio_chip); - gpiochip_remove(&pfc->func->gpio_chip); + sh_pfc_remove_function_gpios(pfc); return 0; }diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.hb/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h index c7508d5f688613b2..c6f9163b3e23041f 100644--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h@@ -138,8 +138,10 @@ struct sh_pfc_soc_info { const struct sh_pfc_function *functions; unsigned int nr_functions; +#ifdef CONFIG_SUPERH const struct pinmux_func *func_gpios; unsigned int nr_func_gpios; +#endif const struct pinmux_cfg_reg *cfg_regs; const struct pinmux_data_reg *data_regs;
-- Regards, Laurent Pinchart