Hi S?ren,

2015-05-27 3:37 GMT+09:00 S?ren Brinkmann [off-list ref]:

On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 10:12AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

On Tuesday 26 May 2015 13:18:29 Masahiro Yamada wrote:

quoted

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c
index 04748a4..0ff653c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c

@@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int zynq_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

        pctrl->pctrl = pinctrl_register(&zynq_desc, &pdev->dev, pctrl);
        if (!pctrl->pctrl)
-               return -ENOMEM;
+               return -EINVAL;

        platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctrl);

One choice seems as bad as the other to me ;-)

Could we add a pinctrl_register_reason() variant that returns a meaningful
error code as ERR_PTR?

I agree with Arnd. As long as we don't get a precise error code we can
just keep the current one.

OK. Let's not do this way.


I will try pinctrl_register_reason().



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada