On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 10:12AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 26 May 2015 13:18:29 Masahiro Yamada wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c
index 04748a4..0ff653c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c
@@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int zynq_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pctrl->pctrl = pinctrl_register(&zynq_desc, &pdev->dev, pctrl);
if (!pctrl->pctrl)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return -EINVAL;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctrl);
One choice seems as bad as the other to me ;-)
Could we add a pinctrl_register_reason() variant that returns a meaningful
error code as ERR_PTR?
I agree with Arnd. As long as we don't get a precise error code we can
just keep the current one.
S?ren