Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 3 authors, 2015-03-26
STALE4127d REVIEWED: 1 (0M)
Revisions (4)
  1. v4 [diff vs current]
  2. v4 [diff vs current]
  3. v5 current
  4. v5 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v5 3/6] hw/intc: arm_gic_kvm.c restore config first

From: Alex Bennée <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-23 17:05:41
Also in: kvm, kvmarm, qemu-devel
Subsystem: the rest · Maintainer: Linus Torvalds

As there is logic to deal with the difference between edge and level
triggered interrupts in the kernel we must ensure it knows the
configuration of the IRQs before we restore the pending state.

Signed-off-by: Alex Benn?e <redacted>
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <redacted>
diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
index 0d20750..e2512f1 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
@@ -370,6 +370,11 @@ static void kvm_arm_gic_put(GICState *s)
      * the appropriate CPU interfaces in the kernel) */
     kvm_dist_put(s, 0x800, 8, s->num_irq, translate_targets);
 
+    /* irq_state[n].trigger -> GICD_ICFGRn
+     * (restore targets before pending IRQs so we treat level/edge
+     * correctly */
+    kvm_dist_put(s, 0xc00, 2, s->num_irq, translate_trigger);
+
     /* irq_state[n].pending + irq_state[n].level -> GICD_ISPENDRn */
     kvm_dist_put(s, 0x280, 1, s->num_irq, translate_clear);
     kvm_dist_put(s, 0x200, 1, s->num_irq, translate_pending);
@@ -378,8 +383,6 @@ static void kvm_arm_gic_put(GICState *s)
     kvm_dist_put(s, 0x380, 1, s->num_irq, translate_clear);
     kvm_dist_put(s, 0x300, 1, s->num_irq, translate_active);
 
-    /* irq_state[n].trigger -> GICD_ICFRn */
-    kvm_dist_put(s, 0xc00, 2, s->num_irq, translate_trigger);
 
     /* s->priorityX[irq] -> ICD_IPRIORITYRn */
     kvm_dist_put(s, 0x400, 8, s->num_irq, translate_priority);
-- 
2.3.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help