Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

Hello Andreas,

Hi,

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Andreas F?rber [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Am 16.03.2015 um 08:56 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:

quoted

I think this should be defined in exynos5410.dtsi instead since is an
IP block in the SoC and referenced in the .dts using a label to change
the clock-frequency in the board.

I hope you understood that this is a literal copy of smdk5410, so I'm
not going to make random changes here. If the Samsung guys want to make
this change for smdk5410, then fine, but otherwise - like for Snow and
Spring - I want to keep the diff -u low between the two.

Yes I did understand that it was a copy but I thought it could be
improved anyways. But I don't have a strong opinion either to block
this series and always both DTS can be changed as a follow-up. So I'm
ok with your decision to keeping the delta to the minimum for now.

Yeah, everybody can update everything in mainline if it can be got review in
mailinglist. BTW asthe fin_pll can be different according to board condition
that's why it is defined in each boart DT file, it is mostly same on each
boards though...So I think keeping it would be more make sense.

Thanks,
Kukjin