[PATCH v3 3/6] Documentation: DT: Document twl4030-madc-battery bindings
From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-16 21:05:38
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-omap, linux-pm, lkml
On Wed 2015-02-04 23:14:32, Marek Belisko wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko <redacted> --- .../bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txtdiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bb3580c --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +twl4030_madc_battery + +Required properties: + - compatible : "ti,twl4030-madc-battery" + - capacity-uah : battery capacity in uAh
Could we make it capacity-uAh ?
+ - volt-to-capacity-charging-map : list of voltage(mV):level(%) values + for charging calibration (see example) + - volt-to-capacity-discharging-map : list of voltage(mV):level(%) values + for discharging calibration (see example)
Would "mV-to-capacity..." be more accurate? Also, would it make sense to introduce coefficients for temperature and discharge rate? Thanks, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html