On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 11:44:05AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:

On 03/06/15 10:57, Mike Turquette wrote:

quoted

Uwe,

Thanks for the fixes. I'm thinking of taking all three for 4.0. I also
agree on clk_round_rate_nearest (along with a _ceil and _floor version
as well). That's something we can do for 4.1 probably.

There are currently 3 users of CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST:

Loongson
QCOM
ST

So now is probably the right time to remove the flag if we're going to
do it.

What do you think?

I may have had to do divider round closest on qcom platforms because of
the problem these patches are for. I'll have to go back and look.

When you do that, also check if it works for you. I think the
implementation is broken for most of the cases.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |