Hi, Balbi

On 02/18/2015 10:35 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 01:44:21PM +0800, zhangfei wrote:

quoted

Hi, Kishon

On 02/18/2015 01:35 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:

quoted

Hi,

On Thursday 12 February 2015 01:07 PM, Zhangfei Gao wrote:

quoted

Add usb phy controller for hi6220 platform

Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
---
  drivers/phy/Kconfig          |   9 ++
  drivers/phy/Makefile         |   1 +
  drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c | 306
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 316 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c

why is this driver in drivers/phy when it doesn't use the generic PHY
framework at all?

Balbi recommended "new drivers only on drivers/phy/", including usb
phy.

but it should use the API too. It's not only about a directory, you need
to use the new API.

quoted

So Move drivers/usb/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c to
drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c, required by Balbi.

you're reading what I stated the way you like.

Sorry for my bad understanding.

Still not clear about the otg_set_peripheral, which is required in 
phy-hi6220-usb.c

1. drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c use
otg_set_peripheral(hsotg->uphy->otg, &hsotg->gadget);

2. include/linux/phy/phy.h
struct phy do not have member otg, while struct usb_phy has.

Could you give more hints?

Thanks