Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 5 authors, 2015-02-04

RFC on cpufreq implementation

From: Mason <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-19 22:03:54
Also in: linux-pm

On 19/01/2015 08:52, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 15 January 2015 at 22:54, Mason wrote:
quoted
I decided to expose only a small subset of frequencies (namely
{999,500,333,111} MHz) because, in my tests, the ondemand gov
chose mostly min and max, and the intermediate frequencies not
so much; so I figured "2 intermediate freqs" is good enough.
(I'm ready to hear otherwise.)
Following patch solved this issue in 3.17..

6393d6a1027e cpufreq: ondemand: Eliminate the deadband effect
Good to know, thanks! (I'm on 3.14)

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6393d6a1027ec1d69ec6246f6c7c2186f76c2abb

Do you have other comments/suggestions regarding my code?

Regards.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help