RFC on cpufreq implementation
From: Mason <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-19 22:03:54
Also in:
linux-pm
From: Mason <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-19 22:03:54
Also in:
linux-pm
On 19/01/2015 08:52, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 15 January 2015 at 22:54, Mason wrote:quoted
I decided to expose only a small subset of frequencies (namely {999,500,333,111} MHz) because, in my tests, the ondemand gov chose mostly min and max, and the intermediate frequencies not so much; so I figured "2 intermediate freqs" is good enough. (I'm ready to hear otherwise.)Following patch solved this issue in 3.17.. 6393d6a1027e cpufreq: ondemand: Eliminate the deadband effect
Good to know, thanks! (I'm on 3.14) https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6393d6a1027ec1d69ec6246f6c7c2186f76c2abb Do you have other comments/suggestions regarding my code? Regards.