Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 5 authors, 2015-02-04

RFC on cpufreq implementation

From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
Date: 2015-01-19 07:52:52
Also in: linux-pm

On 15 January 2015 at 22:54, Mason [off-list ref] wrote:
I decided to expose only a small subset of frequencies (namely
{999,500,333,111} MHz) because, in my tests, the ondemand gov
chose mostly min and max, and the intermediate frequencies not
so much; so I figured "2 intermediate freqs" is good enough.
(I'm ready to hear otherwise.)
Following patch solved this issue in 3.17..

6393d6a1027e cpufreq: ondemand: Eliminate the deadband effect
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help