RFC on cpufreq implementation
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
Date: 2015-01-19 07:52:52
Also in:
linux-pm
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
Date: 2015-01-19 07:52:52
Also in:
linux-pm
On 15 January 2015 at 22:54, Mason [off-list ref] wrote:
I decided to expose only a small subset of frequencies (namely
{999,500,333,111} MHz) because, in my tests, the ondemand gov
chose mostly min and max, and the intermediate frequencies not
so much; so I figured "2 intermediate freqs" is good enough.
(I'm ready to hear otherwise.)Following patch solved this issue in 3.17.. 6393d6a1027e cpufreq: ondemand: Eliminate the deadband effect