[PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: Add support for Spreadtrum's Sharkl64 Platform in Kconfig and defconfig

Hi, Mark

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:00:10AM +0000, Chunyan Zhang wrote:

quoted

From: Zhizhou Zhang <redacted>

Adds support for Spreadtrum's SoC Platform in the arm64 Kconfig and
defconfig files.

Signed-off-by: Zhizhou Zhang <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Orson Zhai <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig           |    5 +++++
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig |    1 +
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index b1f9a20..885c1f4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig

@@ -153,6 +153,11 @@ config ARCH_SEATTLE
      help
        This enables support for AMD Seattle SOC Family

+config ARCH_SPRD

This should presumably be ARCH_SHARKL64, so you can add other SoC
families later. The other entries in here are already formatted that
way.

I wonder if we should have these of the form ARCH_${VENDOR}_${FAMILY}
(e.g. ARCH_SPRD_SHARKL64) rather than just ARCH_${FAMILY} to save
ourselves from name conflicts in future (and to make it easier to grep
for a particular vendor's config options).

actually we've discussed this question before[1], and I think Arnd's
suggestion is suitable for our case, so I changed this to use
ARCH_SPRD instead of ARCH_SHARKL64.

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/306246.html

anyway, thank you very much!

Chunyan

quoted

+     bool "Spreadtrum SoC platform"

bool "Spreadtrun Sharkl64 SoC Family"

quoted

+     help
+       Support for Spreadtrum ARM based SoCs

Support for the Spreadtrum Sharkl64 SoC family.

Thanks,
Mark.

quoted

+