[PATCH v11 2/9] ARM: l2c: use l2c_write_sec() for restoring latency and filter regs
From: m.szyprowski@samsung.com (Marek Szyprowski)
Date: 2015-01-07 10:48:08
Also in:
linux-omap, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
Hello, On 2015-01-05 18:20, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 13:19-20150105, Marek Szyprowski wrote:quoted
All four register for latency and filter settings cannot be written in non-secure mode and they should go through l2c_write_sec(). More on this can be found in CoreLink Level 2 Cache Controller L2C-310 Technical Reference Manual, 3.2. Register summary, table 3.1. This have been checked the TRM for r3p3, but it should be uniform for all revisions. Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <redacted> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> --- arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c index 5e65ca8dea62..0aeeaa95c42d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c@@ -623,14 +623,14 @@ static void l2c310_resume(void) unsigned revision; /* restore pl310 setup */ - writel_relaxed(l2x0_saved_regs.tag_latency, - base + L310_TAG_LATENCY_CTRL); - writel_relaxed(l2x0_saved_regs.data_latency, - base + L310_DATA_LATENCY_CTRL); - writel_relaxed(l2x0_saved_regs.filter_end, - base + L310_ADDR_FILTER_END); - writel_relaxed(l2x0_saved_regs.filter_start, - base + L310_ADDR_FILTER_START); + l2c_write_sec(l2x0_saved_regs.tag_latency, base, + L310_TAG_LATENCY_CTRL); + l2c_write_sec(l2x0_saved_regs.data_latency, base, + L310_DATA_LATENCY_CTRL); + l2c_write_sec(l2x0_saved_regs.filter_end, base, + L310_ADDR_FILTER_END); + l2c_write_sec(l2x0_saved_regs.filter_start, base, + L310_ADDR_FILTER_START); revision = readl_relaxed(base + L2X0_CACHE_ID) & L2X0_CACHE_ID_RTL_MASK;Do you need the following as well at this point in the patch series? Agreed that the writes will disappear later in the series.
Right. Thanks for pointing this. I will send an updated version, which will also fix the checkpatch --strict issues.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c index 0aeeaa9..7afab37 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c@@ -1135,28 +1135,28 @@ static void __init l2c310_of_parse(const struct device_node *np, of_property_read_u32_array(np, "arm,tag-latency", tag, ARRAY_SIZE(tag)); if (tag[0] && tag[1] && tag[2]) - writel_relaxed( + l2c_write_sec( L310_LATENCY_CTRL_RD(tag[0] - 1) | L310_LATENCY_CTRL_WR(tag[1] - 1) | L310_LATENCY_CTRL_SETUP(tag[2] - 1), - l2x0_base + L310_TAG_LATENCY_CTRL); + l2x0_base, L310_TAG_LATENCY_CTRL); of_property_read_u32_array(np, "arm,data-latency", data, ARRAY_SIZE(data)); if (data[0] && data[1] && data[2]) - writel_relaxed( + l2c_write_sec( L310_LATENCY_CTRL_RD(data[0] - 1) | L310_LATENCY_CTRL_WR(data[1] - 1) | L310_LATENCY_CTRL_SETUP(data[2] - 1), - l2x0_base + L310_DATA_LATENCY_CTRL); + l2x0_base, L310_DATA_LATENCY_CTRL); of_property_read_u32_array(np, "arm,filter-ranges", filter, ARRAY_SIZE(filter)); if (filter[1]) { - writel_relaxed(ALIGN(filter[0] + filter[1], SZ_1M), - l2x0_base + L310_ADDR_FILTER_END); - writel_relaxed((filter[0] & ~(SZ_1M - 1)) | L310_ADDR_FILTER_EN, - l2x0_base + L310_ADDR_FILTER_START); + l2c_write_sec(ALIGN(filter[0] + filter[1], SZ_1M), + l2x0_base, L310_ADDR_FILTER_END); + l2c_write_sec((filter[0] & ~(SZ_1M - 1)) | L310_ADDR_FILTER_EN, + l2x0_base, L310_ADDR_FILTER_START); } ret = l2x0_cache_size_of_parse(np, aux_val, aux_mask, &assoc, SZ_512K);
Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland