[PATCH v5 0/4] Fixes for SDIO interrupts for dw_mmc
From: Ulf Hansson <hidden>
Date: 2014-12-30 10:29:14
Also in:
linux-mmc, linux-omap, lkml
On 19 December 2014 at 20:02, Doug Anderson [off-list ref] wrote:
Ulf, On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Ulf Hansson [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 3 December 2014 at 00:42, Doug Anderson [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Bing Zhao at Marvell found a problem with dw_mmc where interrupts weren't firing sometimes. He tracked it down to a read-modify-write problem with the INTMASK. These patches fix the problem. Note: I've picked up a > 1-year old series here to make another attempt at landing it upstream. These patches have been in shipping Chromebooks for the last year. Note that v3 to v4 has no changes other than a rebase and a small commit message update. The first two patches extend the "init_card()" mechanism of MMC core to actually be called for all card types, not just SDIO. That could be applied any time and should fix at least one longstanding bug (untested). The third patch is a cleanup patch to use init_card() to move things around a bit so we don't need to handle SDIO cards in such a strange place. On earlier versions of this patch Seungwon brought up a few points which I have _not_ addressed. See <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3049071/>. Other than talk of cards with out of band interrupts maybe being able to gate their clocks, he wanted to use MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_CLK_GATING. I didn't do that because of the ordering of init_card() and when the quirks are set. Some users of init_card() like pandora_wl1251_init_card() rely on it being called very early in the process. pandora_wl1251_init_card() hardcodes a vendor and device and thus need to be called super early. On the other hand the code that adds quirks _reads_ the vendor and device. It can't possibly move before init_card(). If folks are willing to take an additional host op of init_card_late() I can certainly go that way, though. The fourth patch is (I think) reviewed and ready to go assuming the other two land.I have queued this up for 3.20.Thanks!quoted
It was a bit hard to follow the updated the revisions, please don't send patches "in-reply-to" for future sets.Very strange. I didn't send out anything in-reply-to other than what git-send-email usually does. I believe I had: [0] - no in reply to. [1] - in reply to [0] [2] - in reply to [0] [3] - in reply to [0] [4] - in reply to [0]
That's good. As long as there are no in-reply to previous versions of patches/patchsets. I am using gmails web-based client so it could very well be that it does some magic, which I am not yet aware of.
Is there some other way you'd prefer? Looking full headers in <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5425241/>, I confirm it is "in-reply-to" "1417563767-32181-1-git-send-email-dianders at chromium.org". Patchwork doesn't keep cover letters, but you can see at <http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg29699.html>) that there is no in-reply-to. I'm more than happy to adjust my workflow if you can give me some specifics. Thanks! :)quoted
In v5, I don't find a patch 1/4. Anyway, I have taken patch 2->4.Ah, maybe because it wasn't sent to linux-mmc? I messed that up and will try to do better in the future. Sorry. :( You were in the To line, though. You can see at <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5425241/>. Do you want me to repost it and CC linux-mmc with Tony's Ack?
I suggest you have a look at my next branch and to verify that I haven't screwed things up. If so, either I should drop the patches and you make a resend or if it's possible to just send an incremental path on top? Kind regards Uffe
--- Note: patchwork seems to find all my patches: pwclient list -w dianders at chromium.org -p "" 5425241 New [v5,1/4] ARM: OMAP2+: Make sure pandora_wl1251_init_card() applies to SDIO only 5425291 New [v5,1/4] ARM: OMAP2+: Make sure pandora_wl1251_init_card() applies to SDIO only 5425311 New [v5,1/4] ARM: OMAP2+: Make sure pandora_wl1251_init_card() applies to SDIO only 5425231 New [v5,2/4] mmc: core: Support the optional init_card() callback for MMC and SD 5425301 New [v5,2/4] mmc: core: Support the optional init_card() callback for MMC and SD 5425271 New [v5,3/4] mmc: dw_mmc: Cleanup disable of low power mode w/ SDIO interrupts 5425281 New [v5,3/4] mmc: dw_mmc: Cleanup disable of low power mode w/ SDIO interrupts 5425251 New [v5,4/4] mmc: dw_mmc: Protect read-modify-write of INTMASK with a lock 5425261 New [v5,4/4] mmc: dw_mmc: Protect read-modify-write of INTMASK with a lock