On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:50:17AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

On Wednesday 03 December 2014 17:17:13 Lyra Zhang wrote:

quoted

2014-11-27 2:29 GMT+08:00 Murali Karicheri [off-list ref]:

quoted

How about sorting this includes? asm/irq.h go first followed linux/ in alphabatical order?

There are a few compile warnings if I moved asm/irq.h to the top of
all included files.

The order that Murali meant is

- first all linux/*.h headers, sorted alphabetically
- then all asm/*.h headers, again sorted alphabetically

This is the recommended style in general.

quoted

Warning details are below:

In file included from drivers/tty/serial/sprd_serial.c:14:0:
./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h:6:39: warning: ?struct pt_regs?
declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
 extern void (*handle_arch_irq)(struct pt_regs *);
                                       ^
./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h:6:39: warning: its scope is only this
definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
[enabled by default]
./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h:8:54: warning: ?struct pt_regs?
declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
 extern void set_handle_irq(void (*handle_irq)(struct pt_regs *));

I would consider this a (minor) bug in asm/irq.h. If you don't mind,
please submit a patch to add a line with 'struct pt_regs;' to
asm/irq.h.

A better question is: why is a modern driver using asm/irq.h in the
first place.

We used to include that file when platforms defined IRQ numbers
statically, but modern platforms don't do that, so it shouldn't be
required anymore.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.