Thread (46 messages) 46 messages, 14 authors, 2014-12-03

[PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: dts: Add support for Spreadtrum SC9836 SoC in dts and Makefile

From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: 2014-11-28 14:47:44
Also in: linux-api, linux-devicetree, linux-serial, lkml

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 02:44:12PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 02:35:32PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 02:29:13PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 01:43:09PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:12:15PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:50:43AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:16:56PM +0000, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
quoted
+
+       timer {
+               compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
+               interrupts = <1 13 0xff01>,
+                            <1 14 0xff01>,
+                            <1 11 0xff01>,
+                            <1 10 0xff01>;
+               clock-frequency = <26000000>;
Please remove the clock-frequency property. Your FW should initialise
CNTFRQ_EL0 on all CPUs (certainly PSCI 0.2 requires that you do this).
Since this comes up regularly, I think we need a dev_warn() in the arch
timer driver when CONFIG_ARM64.
I'll ack such a patch ;)
How rude would this be?
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index 2133f9d59d06..aaaf3433ccb9 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -371,7 +371,8 @@ arch_timer_detect_rate(void __iomem *cntbase, struct device_node *np)
		return;
 
	/* Try to determine the frequency from the device tree or CNTFRQ */
-	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &arch_timer_rate)) {
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) ||
+	    of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &arch_timer_rate)) {
		if (cntbase)
			arch_timer_rate = readl_relaxed(cntbase + CNTFRQ);
		else
Probably too rude, given it doesn't WARN() the user.
We override broken hardware ID registers all the time in device-tree without
dumping stack. Why is this any different?
Exposure to guests via KVM, and the fact that it's possible to write to
the register from EL3. This isn't so much broken HW (which cannot be
fixed) as broken FW (which can be fixed).

Printing the warning gives people the chance to realise and fix the
issue during bringup.

Mark.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help