2014-11-24 17:54 GMT+08:00 Ulf Hansson [off-list ref]:

On 21 November 2014 at 01:51, Vincent Yang
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hello,

  Fujitsu have an sdhci IP which is implemented in a SoC we're
adding to mainline, the most recent series for that was sent
here:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/304522.html

  These patches are against v3.18-rc5 mainline and tested on
v3.18-rc5 integration tree.

  We welcome any comment and advice about how to make any
improvements or better align them with upstream.

Apparently, there's a dependency between this patchset and the upper
one you refereed to. That's a problem.

This patchset does not require anything from the upper one I refereed to.
The only reason we mentioned it is to show that this sdhci IP driver will have
something using it shortly in the kernel.

Preferably, try to remove the dependency and send all mmc patches to
the mmc list. If that's not possible, you need to send these two
patchsets as one instead.

quoted

Thanks.

Vincent Yang (4):
  mmc: sdhci: add a voltage switch callback function
  mmc: sdhci: add a quirk for tuning work around
  mmc: sdhci: add a quirk for single block transactions
  mmc: core: hold SD Clock before CMD11 during Signal

The last one I consider as a separate fix for mmc core. I will apply
it to my mmc tree.

Thanks!

Thank you and kind regards,
Vincent

Thanks and kind regards
Uffe