[PATCH v4 18/18] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64
From: Graeme Gregory <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-17 16:05:14
Also in:
linux-acpi, lkml
From: Graeme Gregory <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-17 16:05:14
Also in:
linux-acpi, lkml
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 02:44:10AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:00:16PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:quoted
+Common _DSD bindings should be submitted to ASWG to be included in the +document :- + +http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-implementation-guide-toplevel.htmHow are individuals/companies who aren't UEFI members supposed to do this? Aren't there IP issues involved in taking submissions from non-members?
This section needs to be changed anyway, it comes out of a misunderstanding I had of the _DSD spec. It sounds like from the discussions in other threads that ARM64 should be following x86 and re-using DT bindings here. In which case there is not need to submit things to UEFI organisation. What I got a little lost in has there been a formal decision about DT bindings in _DSD? Graeme