Thread (89 messages) 89 messages, 15 authors, 2014-09-22

[PATCH v4 18/18] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

From: Graeme Gregory <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-17 16:05:14
Also in: linux-acpi, lkml

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 02:44:10AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:00:16PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
quoted
+Common _DSD bindings should be submitted to ASWG to be included in the
+document :-
+
+http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-implementation-guide-toplevel.htm
How are individuals/companies who aren't UEFI members supposed to do 
this? Aren't there IP issues involved in taking submissions from 
non-members?
This section needs to be changed anyway, it comes out of a
misunderstanding I had of the _DSD spec.

It sounds like from the discussions in other threads that ARM64 should
be following x86 and re-using DT bindings here. In which case there is
not need to submit things to UEFI organisation.

What I got a little lost in has there been a formal decision about DT
bindings in _DSD?

Graeme
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help