Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 4 authors, 2014-09-04

[PATCH v4 7/8] ARM: mm: allow non-text sections to be non-executable

From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-20 12:37:19
Also in: lkml

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:06:32PM +0100, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted
Adds CONFIG_ARM_KERNMEM_PERMS to separate the kernel memory regions
into section-sized areas that can have different permisions. Performs
the NX permission changes during free_initmem, so that init memory can be
reclaimed.

This uses section size instead of PMD size to reduce memory lost to
padding on non-LPAE systems.

Based on work by Brad Spengler, Larry Bassel, and Laura Abbott.
[...]
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
index 6f57cb94367f..a3d07ca2bbb4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -8,6 +8,9 @@
 #include <asm/thread_info.h>
 #include <asm/memory.h>
 #include <asm/page.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_KERNMEM_PERMS
+#include <asm/pgtable.h>
+#endif

 #define PROC_INFO                                                    \
      . = ALIGN(4);                                                   \
@@ -90,6 +93,11 @@ SECTIONS
              _text = .;
              HEAD_TEXT
      }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_KERNMEM_PERMS
+     . = ALIGN(1<<SECTION_SHIFT);
+#endif
+
      .text : {                       /* Real text segment            */
              _stext = .;             /* Text and read-only data      */
                      __exception_text_start = .;
@@ -145,7 +153,11 @@ SECTIONS
      _etext = .;                     /* End of text and rodata section */

 #ifndef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL
+# ifdef CONFIG_ARM_KERNMEM_PERMS
+     . = ALIGN(1<<SECTION_SHIFT);
+# else
      . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
+# endif
This might be cleaner if we had a single macro (ALIGN_MIN?) that expanded to
ALIGN(1 << SECTION_SHIFT) #ifdef  CONFIG_ARM_KERNMEM_PERMS.
I didn't see a cleaner way to do this, since some times it's optional
(no alignment instead of different alignment), and sometimes it's not
controlled by _KERNMEM_PERMS (i.e. sometimes it's _DEBUG_RODATA).
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
index ad82c05bfc3a..ccf392ef40d4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
@@ -32,6 +32,11 @@
 #include <asm/tlb.h>
 #include <asm/fixmap.h>

+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_KERNMEM_PERMS
+#include <asm/system_info.h>
+#include <asm/cp15.h>
+#endif
We already #include cp15.h in this file. If you need system_info.h, I don't
think you should bother making the include conditional.
Ah, yes. I will fix this.
quoted
+/*
+ * Updates section permissions only for the current mm (sections are
+ * copied into each mm). During startup, this is the init_mm.
+ */
+static inline void section_update(unsigned long addr, pmdval_t mask,
+                               pmdval_t prot)
+{
+     struct mm_struct *mm;
+     pmd_t *pmd;
+
+     mm = current->active_mm;
+     pmd = pmd_offset(pud_offset(pgd_offset(mm, addr), addr), addr);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE
+     pmd[0] = __pmd((pmd_val(pmd[0]) & mask) | prot);
+#else
+     if (addr & SECTION_SIZE)
+             pmd[1] = __pmd((pmd_val(pmd[1]) & mask) | prot);
+     else
+             pmd[0] = __pmd((pmd_val(pmd[0]) & mask) | prot);
+#endif
+     flush_pmd_entry(pmd);
+     local_flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, addr + SECTION_SIZE);
Why only a local flush? You're changing global mappings here, right?
Yes, but with the a15 errata, it cannot use a global flush. As a
result, section_update can only be used by a single CPU which is how
the usage is managed. Perhaps I should add some comments to that
effect? (There was a thread a few months ago on this problem and this
shook out as a solution.)
quoted
+}
+
+/* Make sure extended page tables are in use. */
+static inline bool arch_has_strict_perms(void)
+{
+     unsigned int cr;
+
+     if (cpu_architecture() < CPU_ARCH_ARMv6)
+             return false;
+
+     cr = get_cr();
+     if (!(cr & CR_XP))
+             return false;
+
+     return true;
return !!(get_cr() & CR_XP)?
Sure, I can reduce this.
quoted
+}
+
+#define set_section_perms(perms, field)      {                               \
+     size_t i;                                                       \
+     unsigned long addr;                                             \
+                                                                     \
+     if (!arch_has_strict_perms())                                   \
+             return;                                                 \
+                                                                     \
+     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(perms); i++) {                       \
+             if (!IS_ALIGNED(perms[i].start, SECTION_SIZE) ||        \
+                 !IS_ALIGNED(perms[i].end, SECTION_SIZE)) {          \
+                     pr_err("BUG: section %lx-%lx not aligned to %lx\n", \
+                             perms[i].start, perms[i].end,           \
+                             SECTION_SIZE);                          \
+                     continue;                                       \
+             }                                                       \
+                                                                     \
+             for (addr = perms[i].start;                             \
+                  addr < perms[i].end;                               \
+                  addr += SECTION_SIZE)                              \
+                     section_update(addr, perms[i].mask,             \
+                                    perms[i].field);                 \
+     }                                                               \
+}
+
+static inline void fix_kernmem_perms(void)
+{
+     set_section_perms(nx_perms, prot);
+}
+#else
+static inline void fix_kernmem_perms(void) { }
+#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_KERNMEM_PERMS */
+
 void free_initmem(void)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_TCM
      extern char __tcm_start, __tcm_end;
+#endif
+
+     fix_kernmem_perms();

+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_TCM
You could avoid the double #ifdef by moving the tcm stuff into another
function (free_tcmmem?)
Sure, I can do that.

Thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help