[PATCH v3 13/15] cpufreq: Add cpufreq driver for Tegra124
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
Date: 2014-08-19 05:55:50
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pm, linux-tegra, lkml
On 19 August 2014 09:03, Tuomas Tynkkynen [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Tuomas Tynkkynen <redacted> Add a new cpufreq driver for Tegra124. Instead of using the PLLX as the CPU clocksource, switch immediately to the DFLL. It allows the use of higher clock rates, and will automatically scale the CPU voltage as well. Besides the CPU clocksource switch, we let the cpufreq-cpu0 driver for all the cpufreq operations. This driver also relies on the DFLL driver to fill the OPP table for the CPU0 device, so that the cpufreq-cpu0 driver knows what frequencies to use. Signed-off-by: Tuomas Tynkkynen <redacted> --- v3: - separate Kconfig entry
Gud..
- use 'select GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0', not depends
Bad :( It *has* to be a depends here, its not optional. That was outcome of the chat we had last time, if I remember it well..
- support unbinding of the platform device - allocate a state structure instead of globals - use of_match_machine() - various style nits fixed ---
You don't need to add these --- here, just add a blank line and git will take care of things for you :)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 8 ++ drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 + drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c | 206 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 215 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.cdiff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm index 3795a16..07bfed1 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm@@ -247,3 +247,11 @@ config ARM_TEGRA20_CPUFREQ default y help This adds the CPUFreq driver support for Tegra20 SOCs. + +config ARM_TEGRA124_CPUFREQ + bool "Tegra124 CPUFreq support" + depends on ARCH_TEGRA + select GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0
So it will become: depends on ARCH_TEGRA && GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0
+static int tegra124_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{+ priv->vdd_cpu_reg = regulator_get(get_cpu_device(0), "vdd-cpu");
get_cpu_device() can fail as well, and so you may want to check its return value as well..
+static int __init tegra_cpufreq_init(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct platform_device *pdev;
+
+ if (!of_match_machine(soc_of_matches))
+ return -ENODEV;You may want to add a comment here on why you chose to add another layer of platform device/driver.. i.e. to catch -EPROBE_DEFER from clk-APIs..
+ ret = platform_driver_register(&tegra124_cpufreq_platdrv);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ pdev = platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-tegra124", -1, NULL, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
+ platform_driver_unregister(&tegra124_cpufreq_platdrv);
+ return PTR_ERR(pdev);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+module_init(tegra_cpufreq_init);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Tuomas Tynkkynen [off-list ref]");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("cpufreq driver for NVIDIA Tegra124");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
1.8.1.5