[PATCH v4 4/5] cpufreq: Properly handle physical CPU hot-add/hot-remove
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
Date: 2014-08-07 11:02:30
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, lkml
On 25 July 2014 06:37, Saravana Kannan [off-list ref] wrote:
When CPUs are physically added/removed, its cpuX sysfs directory is dynamically added/removed. To handle this correctly, the cpufreq sysfs nodes also need to be added/removed dynamically.
Hmm, in that case why should we take this thread? I mean, if we do need to add/remove sysfs links or move kobjects around, what would we achieve with this patchset?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <redacted> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index d9fc6e5..97edf05 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpufreq_policy *, cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback); static DEFINE_RWLOCK(cpufreq_driver_lock); DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_governor_lock); static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_policy_list); +static cpumask_t has_symlink; /* This one keeps track of the previously set governor of a removed CPU */ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN], cpufreq_cpu_governor);@@ -865,7 +866,10 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev_symlink(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) unsigned int j; int ret = 0; - for_each_cpu(j, policy->related_cpus) { + /* Only some of the related CPUs might be present. So, create + * symlinks only for those. + */
Proper styles please.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ for_each_cpu_and(j, policy->related_cpus, cpu_present_mask) { struct device *cpu_dev; if (j == policy->kobj_cpu)@@ -877,6 +881,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev_symlink(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) "cpufreq"); if (ret) break; + cpumask_set_cpu(j, &has_symlink); } return ret; }@@ -1101,9 +1106,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) unsigned long flags; bool recover_policy = cpufreq_suspended; - if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) - return 0; -
Why?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
pr_debug("adding CPU %u\n", cpu); #ifdef CONFIG_SMP@@ -1111,7 +1113,19 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) * CPU because it is in the same boat. */ policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); if (policy) { - if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus)) + /* If a CPU gets physically plugged in after one or more of + * its related CPUs are ONLINE, we need to create a symlink + * for it since it wouldn't have been created when the policy + * was initialized. Do this as soon as it's plugged in. + */ + if (sif && !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &has_symlink)) {
Why check for sif?
+ ret = sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, &policy->kobj, + "cpufreq"); + if (!ret) + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &has_symlink); + } +
Move all this to cpufreq_add_policy_cpu()..
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) && cpu_online(cpu)) ret = cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu, dev); else ret = 0;@@ -1120,6 +1134,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) } #endif + if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) + return 0; +
Don't know why we moved it here.. cpufreq_add_dev will only be called for online CPUs..
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
if (!down_read_trylock(&cpufreq_rwsem)) return 0;@@ -1303,25 +1320,24 @@ static int cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int old_cpu) { struct device *cpu_dev; + unsigned int new_cpu; int ret; /* first sibling now owns the new sysfs dir */ - cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpumask_any_but(policy->cpus, old_cpu)); + for_each_cpu_and(new_cpu, policy->related_cpus, cpu_present_mask) + if (new_cpu != old_cpu) + break; + cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(new_cpu); sysfs_remove_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, "cpufreq"); ret = kobject_move(&policy->kobj, &cpu_dev->kobj); if (ret) { pr_err("%s: Failed to move kobj: %d\n", __func__, ret); - - down_write(&policy->rwsem); - cpumask_set_cpu(old_cpu, policy->cpus); - up_write(&policy->rwsem); - ret = sysfs_create_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, &policy->kobj, "cpufreq"); - return -EINVAL; } + cpumask_clear_cpu(new_cpu, &has_symlink); policy->kobj_cpu = cpu_dev->id; return cpu_dev->id;@@ -1407,8 +1423,12 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev, cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus); up_read(&policy->rwsem); - if (cpu != policy->kobj_cpu) + if (cpu != policy->kobj_cpu) { sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "cpufreq"); + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &has_symlink); + } else { + cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(policy, cpu); + }
This has_symlink thing has made it much more complicated..