Am 02.08.2014 14:19, schrieb Tomasz Figa:

Andreas,

Ehh, one more thing. It looks like my memory is playing tricks on me.
Please see inline.

On 02.08.2014 02:52, Andreas F?rber wrote:

quoted

Allows them to be extended by reference.

Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
---
 v6: Split off from Snow/SMDK cleanups (Doug Anderson)

[snip]

quoted

-	serial at 12C00000 {
+	uart0: serial at 12C00000 {
 		clocks = <&clock CLK_UART0>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_UART0>;
 		clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0";
 	};
 
-	serial at 12C10000 {
+	uart1: serial at 12C10000 {
 		clocks = <&clock CLK_UART1>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_UART1>;
 		clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0";
 	};
 
-	serial at 12C20000 {
+	uart2: serial at 12C20000 {
 		clocks = <&clock CLK_UART2>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_UART2>;
 		clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0";
 	};
 
-	serial at 12C30000 {
+	uart3: serial at 12C30000 {
 		clocks = <&clock CLK_UART3>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_UART3>;
 		clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0";
 	};

I forgot about a series [1] that went through tty tree, which is going
to conflict with this patch. It already adds labels to uart nodes in
serial_X format. I don't really remember why I went with this format for
Exynos SoCs and with uartX for older ones...

[1]
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/arch/arm/boot/dts?id=1e64f48ea7c59fb94acd7551dd9fa68b8a752efc

I doubt that I'll manage to resend another time today, so please just
drop those hunks from my patch before applying - I ended up not using
them here.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend?rffer; HRB 16746 AG N?rnberg