Hello.

On 01-08-2014 9:22, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:

quoted

quoted

The board uses aic3106 for audio.

quoted

quoted

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <redacted>
---
   arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++
   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

quoted

quoted

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
index 09118c72e83f..b9ef2be0b145 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts

@@ -51,6 +51,20 @@
               tps: tps at 48 {
                   reg = <0x48>;
               };
+            tlv320aic3106: tlv320aic3106 at 1b {

[...]

quoted

Also, the ePAPR standard [1] says:

quoted

The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the
device and not its precise programming model.

True. This is why the node for the audio support is named as 'sound'. For the
components, like in this case I do not see issue to call the audio codec with
it's name.

    I do. We should follow the standard consistently. Why not call the node 
"sound-codec"?

WBR, Sergei