On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:19:55PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:

Dear Jason Cooper,

On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:16:58 -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:

quoted

quoted

As explained in the cover letter:

 * Series rebased on top of mvebu/fixes + mvebu/soc to take into
   account the conflicts with the changes already merged on the PMSU
   code.

Ok, I've tentatively applied this series to mvebu/soc-cpuidle with a dep
on mvebu/soc and mvebu/fixes.  It'll be in -next tonight.

Great, thanks a lot!

FYI - there's a rather intricate conflict in pmsu.c between cpuidle and
cpufreq.  I'm currently build-testing my merge.  Once it passes, I'll
push it up to for-next and I'd appreciate if you could give it a once
over.  It'll be the HEAD of for-next.

thx,

Jason.