On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:19:55PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Dear Jason Cooper,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:16:58 -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
quoted
quoted
As explained in the cover letter:
* Series rebased on top of mvebu/fixes + mvebu/soc to take into
account the conflicts with the changes already merged on the PMSU
code.
Ok, I've tentatively applied this series to mvebu/soc-cpuidle with a dep
on mvebu/soc and mvebu/fixes. It'll be in -next tonight.
Great, thanks a lot!
FYI - there's a rather intricate conflict in pmsu.c between cpuidle and
cpufreq. I'm currently build-testing my merge. Once it passes, I'll
push it up to for-next and I'd appreciate if you could give it a once
over. It'll be the HEAD of for-next.
thx,
Jason.