On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:59:57AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:

On 7/13/2014 6:14 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:

quoted

Suravee,

On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:05:00PM -0500, suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com wrote:

quoted

From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>

This patch set introduces support for MSI(-X) in GICv2m specification,
which is implemented in some variation of GIC400.

This depends on and has been tested with the V7 of"Add support for PCI in AArch64"
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/14/320).

Grrr.  I mis-spoke against your v1 of this series.  There are more
changes to irq-gic.c than I originally thought in this series.

I am not quite sure what your are referring to.

No problem, it was an old comment.  If you weren't depending on it then it
doesn't matter. ;-)

quoted

Additionally, we have a lot of other significant changes to that driver
as well this cycle.  It would be really helpful if I could take patches
1-3 through irqchip/gic.  I can Ack #4 with the Subject change, and the
branch it lands in can depend on irqchip/gic, no problem there.

Patch 1-3 should be able to go through the irqchip/gic along with
the gicv3 from Marc, which I have rebased this patch against.

Perfect!

Patch 4 is arch64 architectural changes.  Therefore, it might need
to be going through a different branch. Marc/Mark/Will/Catalin, do
you have any suggestions on which branch this should go to?

Yep, I'll Ack it for arm64 to take, conflicts should be minimal.

thx,

Jason.