Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 6 authors, 2014-07-02

[PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0

From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
Date: 2014-07-02 03:32:16
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, lkml

On 2 July 2014 03:30, Mike Turquette [off-list ref] wrote:
I can't help but think this is a pretty ugly solution. Why not specify
Thanks :)
the nature of the cpu clock(s) in DT directly? There was a thread
already that discussed adding such a property to the CPU DT binding but
it seems to have gone cold[1]. Furthermore my mailer sucks and I see now
that my response to that thread never hit the list due to mangled
headers. Here is a copy/paste of my response to the aforementioned
thread:
Atleast I received it.

Yes, I do agree that we need to get this from the DT in more elegant
way but it is going to take some time in doing that, and probably some
people are working on it as that might be used in scheduler-cpufreq
coordination as well..

For now we can go ahead and make it workable, even if it isn't that
elegant and update it later on.

Thanks for your inputs.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help