Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 6 authors, 2014-07-02

[PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0

From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
Date: 2014-06-27 02:15:58
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, lkml

On 27 June 2014 07:23, Mike Turquette [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
but it isn't future-proof if/when the clock framework starts returning
dynamically allocated clock pointers for each clk_get() invocation.
Maybe we need a function in the common clock framework that tells us if
the clocks are the same either via DT or by taking two clock pointers?
I looked through the patch briefly and did not see why we would need to
do this. Any hint?
We want to know which CPUs are sharing clock line, so that we can
fill affected-cpus field of cpufreq core.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help