Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 5 authors, 2014-06-30

[PATCH v6 1/7] phy: add a driver for the Berlin SATA PHY

From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2014-06-24 12:15:34
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-ide, lkml

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Varka Bhadram wrote:
On 06/24/2014 05:30 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
quoted
On Monday 16 June 2014 03:56 PM, Antoine T?nart wrote:
quoted
The Berlin SoC has a two SATA ports. Add a PHY driver to handle them.

The mode selection can let us think this PHY can be configured to fit
other purposes. But there are reasons to think the SATA mode will be
the only one usable: the PHY registers are only accessible indirectly
through two registers in the SATA range, the PHY seems to be integrated
and no information tells us the contrary. For these reasons, make the
driver a SATA PHY driver.

Signed-off-by: Antoine T?nart <redacted>
---
 drivers/phy/Kconfig           |   7 ++
 drivers/phy/Makefile          |   1 +
 drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c | 232 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 240 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c
Please snip all unseccersary code when replying to patches.

[...]
quoted
quoted
+static struct phy *phy_berlin_sata_phy_xlate(struct device *dev,
+					     struct of_phandle_args *args)
Indent the function properly like this:
static struct phy *phy_berlin_sata_phy_xlate(struct device *dev,
					     struct of_phandle_args *args)
You can also indent with TABs, especially if it means the following
line(s) would wrap.
check with checkpatch.pl script
Snippy, snippy.

[...]
quoted
quoted
+static struct platform_driver phy_berlin_sata_driver = {
+	.probe	= phy_berlin_sata_probe,
+	.driver	= {
+		.name		= "phy-berlin-sata",
+		.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+		.of_match_table	= phy_berlin_sata_of_match,
use of_match_ptr for of_match_table
What use is this?

[...]

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help