[RFC PATCH 0/5] Frequency resolution in CCF vs. cpufreq
From: nm@ti.com (Nishanth Menon)
Date: 2014-05-15 12:14:35
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
From: nm@ti.com (Nishanth Menon)
Date: 2014-05-15 12:14:35
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig [off-list ref] wrote: [...]
quoted
cpufreq, which simply divides values it obtains through clk_round_rate() by 1000, 666666. Since passing 666666 to clk_round_rate() does not result in 666666660 (clk_round_rate() always rounds down!), we chose to put 666667 in the OPP. ThisWhat is OPP?
Operating Performance Point (Documentation/power/opp.txt describes frequencies in Hz, the bindings we chose in the community Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/opp.txt describes it in KHz). Regards, Nishanth Menon